Global Hawk?

Cosa sia stato a colpire il Pentagono ancora non si sa con certezza indiscutibile. Alcune tesi individuano nei detriti ritrovati la presenza di un "Global Hawk", drone teleguidato da ricognizione, armato per l'occasione:

Ma alcuni "testimoni oculari" avrebbero individuato delle strisce rosse e blu tipiche della livrea degli aerei della compagnia "American Airlines", quindi per l'occasione avremmo un "Global Hawk":
Ciò che rafforza quest'ipotesi è la presenza di un detrito ritrovato che s'incastrerebbe alla perfezione nella ricostruzione della presa d'aria del "Global Hawk":

http://americanhistory.si.edu/september11/collection/record.asp?ID=28

Riprendendo il particolare ingrandito dalla catena di montaggio del Global Hawk si può fare un confronto per certi aspetti significativo...Ma altri detriti confermerebbero poi l'invadente presenza del drone, per ciò che concerne altri particolari: Riflessione sviluppata da: http://membres.lycos.fr/applemacintosh/pentagon.htm

G8 - Genova, Black Blocks

We should nuke Iran - TS -

It is surely obvious now to anybody with even a basic understanding of history, politics and the nature of fascism that something revolutionary has to be done within months -- if not weeks -- if we are to preserve world peace.
Put boldly and simply, we have to drop a nuclear bomb on Iran.
Not, of course, the unleashing of full-scale thermo-nuclear war on the Persian people, but a limited and tactical use of nuclear weapons to destroy Iran's military facilities and its potential nuclear arsenal. It is, sadly, the only response that this repugnant and acutely dangerous political entity will understand.
The tragedy is that innocent people will die. But not many. Iran's missiles and rockets of mass destruction are guarded and maintained by men with the highest of security clearance and thus supportive of the Tehran regime. They are dedicated to war and, thus, will die in war.
Frankly, it would be churlish of the civilized world to deny martyrdom to those who seem so intent on its pursuance. Most important, a limited nuclear attack on Iran will save thousands if not millions of lives.
The spasm of reaction from many will be that this is barbaric and unacceptable. Yet a better response would be to ask if there is any sensible alternative. Diplomacy, kindness and compromise have failed and the Iranian leadership is still obsessed with all-out war against anybody it considers an enemy.
Its motives are beyond question, its capability equally so. It is spending billions of dollars on a whole range of anti-ship, anti-aircraft and anti-personnel missiles, rockets and ballistic weapons:
The Shahab 3ER missile, with a range of more than 2,000 km, and the BM25 and accompanying launchers, which are so powerful that they can hit targets in Europe. Raad missiles with a range of 350km. The Misaq anti-aircraft missile, which can be fired from the shoulder. The Fajar 3 radar-evading missile and the Ajdar underwater missile, which travels at an extraordinarily high speed and is almost impossible to intercept. The Zaltal and the Fatah 110 rocket, the Scud B and Scud C and the BM25 with a range of 3,500 kms.
Iran is also developing enormous propellant ballistic missiles and began a space program almost a decade ago that will enable it to bomb the United States. It is also assumed in intelligence circles that Tehran has Russian Kh55 cruise missiles stolen from Ukraine which are now being copied in large numbers by Iranian scientists.
Comparisons to the Nazis in the 1930s are unfair -- to the Nazis. Hitler had the French army, the largest in Europe, on his border and millions of Soviet infantry just a few hours march away. Iran has no aggressive enemies in the region.
Its fanatical leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, controls a brutal police state, finances international terror and provokes bloody wars in foreign countries. It is unimaginably wealthy because of its oil revenues and is committed, in its leader's words, to "rolling back 300 years of Western ascendancy" and wiping another nation, Israel, from the face of the earth.
A conventional attack would be insufficient because Iran and its allies seem only to listen to power and threat. Better limited pain now than universal suffering in five years.
The usual suspects will complain. The post-Christian churches, the Marxists, the fellow travelers and fifth columnists. But then, the same sort of people moaned and condemned in 1938. They were clearly wrong then. They would be just as wrong now.

http://www.torontosun.com/News/Columnists/Coren_Michael/2006/09/02/1795183.html

We should nuke Israel - JP -

Egyptian MP: We should nuke Israel
Source: The Jerusalem Post (riportato sotto) February 13, 2007
A prominent Egyptian lawmaker on Monday suggested the Muslim world destroy Israel in a nuclear holocaust in order to halt renovation work outside Jerusalem's Temple Mount.
Muslim leaders claim the work, which is being done on a collapsed earthen ramp leading to the only Temple Mount gate available to non-Muslims, is really an attempt to undermine the foundations of the mosques that currently occupy the holy hill.
Parliament member Mohammed el-Katani, a member of dictator Hosni Mubarak's own party, told his colleagues that the only way to end the affair is to wipe Israel out of existence with nuclear bombs.
On paper, Israel is at peace with Egypt.

http://www.jnewswire.com/article/1650

Arab MP: Only nukes will erase Israel

A member of the Egyptian Parliament from President Hosni Mubarak's ruling party said Monday that nothing short of a nuclear bomb would "work" with Israel.
"That cursed Israel is trying to destroy Al-Aksa Mosque," Mohamed el-Katatny of Mubarak's National Democratic Party (NDP) told the Egyptian Parliament, adding "nothing will work with Israel except for a nuclear bomb that wipes it out of existence."
The harsh statement was uttered during a heated discussion of Israel's renovation of the Mughrabi walkway near the Temple Mount. Egyptian parliamentarians claimed that Israel was destroying the Al-Aksa Mosque.

During the session some parliament members urged a cancellation of all agreements with Israel saying the war between Egypt and Israel was continuing even though treaties were signed.
Israel and Egypt ended 30 years of war with an historic peace treaty in 1979 brokered by the United States between then Egyptian President Anwar al-Sadat and Prime Minister Menachem Begin.

B'nai Brith

Data di fondazione: 13 ottobre 1843

Luogo: New York

Costituzione: si fonda sulla base del testo della costituzione di una loggia massonica, ma non si definisce necessariamente tale

Iscritti: 500.000

Scopo: evitare l'assimilazione della razza da parte dell'umanità

La "Lega Anti-Diffamazione" (A.D.L.) scrive che essa "crede nell’integrazione, cioè nell’accettazione degli ebrei, come eguali. Ma che è opposta all’assimilazione: ossia alla perdita dell’identità ebrea. Uno dei principi dell’Ordine è che "non vi è posto nel "B’nai B’rith" per un Fratello che tiene i suoi figli lontani dalla Comunità Israelitica".

E' la più grande organizzazione ebraica del mondo e una delle più antiche associazioni americane mai esistite.

Motto dell’Ordine : "Benevolenza, Amore fraterno e Armonia".

Recensioni: http://www.disinformazione.it/bnaibrith.htm

http://www.disinformazione.it/bna_brith.htm

http://italy.indymedia.org/news/2006/01/971587.php

Sito italiano: http://www.beneberith-italia.org/ (Commissione Israele)

Articolo

La sede canadese della B'nai Brith (in Ebraico: “Figli del Patto”), la prima organizzazione al mondo al servizio degli ebrei, ha recentemente mosso una denuncia nei confronti di un sito web di Victoria e di tutto il suo staff editoriale, il quale è accusato di contribuire a promuovere l'odio “verso le persone identificate come ebrei e/o come cittadini di Israele”
All'editore Alan Roycroft è stato imposto di rimuovere immediatamente dal sito web “Peace, Earh and News” diciotto articoli che contenevano presunto materiale anti-semita. Sull'accaduto è stata aperta un'inchiesta da parte della Commissione Canadese per i Diritti Umani.
Questi diciotto articoli, così come molti altri articoli presenti su Pej.org, trattano i costi della guerra in Medio Oriente e dei conflitti tra il governo Palestinese ed Israeliano. Il tono degli articoli è abbastanza veemente, ad esempio, un pezzo intitolato “We Should Nuke Israel”, appare come un'imitazione di una colonna del Toronto Sun che propone un attacco tattico contro gli impianti nucleari in Iran.
Secondo Anita Bomberg, rappresentante legale di B'nai Brith Canada, “questi articoli sono violentemente anti-israeliani al punto da oltrepassare quelle che possono essere le critiche legittime, e sfociare nell' anti-semitismo”
Harry Abrams, un uomo d'affari di Victoria (Canada), e membro di B'nai Brith, è la persona che per prima ha denunciato il contenuto dei materiali pubblicati su Pej.org. L'uomo ha affermato che “ci sono troppe calunnie che è necessario denunciare”, come ad esempio l'idea che Israele non abbia diritto di esistere, o che Israele sia una stato razzista”
La polemica tra B'nai Brith e “Peace, Earth and News”, è abbastanza sottile, infatti Roycroft ha affermato che tutti gli esempi riportati da Abrams erano stati citati fuori dal contesto originale, e quindi il significato potrebbe essere stato frainteso. Inoltre, Roycroft ha sottolineato che questi articoli erano critici contro le politiche israeliane, e non c'era alcuna intenzione di esprimere odio verso gli Ebrei.
Il magazine The Globe and Mail ha pubblicato una lettera indirizzata a Roycroft, dove la Commissione Canadese per i Diritti Umani afferma di essere tenuta a raccogliere qualsiasi denuncia riguardante una violazione della Canadian Human Rights Act”.
Da un altro lato, Roycroft ha accettato di rimuovere gli articoli fino a quando il problema non sarà risolto. “Abbiamo rimosso in 24 ore tutti i 18 articoli citati nella denuncia, come cortesia ad Harry Abrams a cui mostriamo la nostra benevolenza. I 18 articoli resteranno nel nostro database, e potranno tornare visibili al pubblico in qualsiasi momento”, ha dichiarato Roycroft.
Secondo la commissione canadese per i diritti umani, nell'eventualità che non venga raggiunto un accordo tra le parti, il caso potrebbe essere preso in esame da un tribunale per i diritti umani.
Abrams ha riferito che ci sarebbero altri siti canadesi sotto indagine per la pubblicazione di possibili contenuti anti-semita.

Project for the New American Century

Gli inascoltati.

Altre strane coincidenze!

Greenberg’s Relationship to Larry Silverstein
On July 24, 2001, six weeks before 9/11, Larry Silverstein took control of the lease of all the WTC buildings. This followed the Port Authority decision on April 26.
According to democraticunderground.com, the three companies who originally insured the WTC were AIG, Marsh and ACE, all run as mentioned by the Greenbergs at the time.
They then sold stakes of the original contract to their competition, a technique called reinsuring. Once the Towers came down, the reinsurers got caught holding the bag.
This would inextricably tie the Greenbergs to Silverstein and the larger conspiracy of 9/11.
If they had no foreknowledge of events to occur, why would the Greenbergs have unloaded so many stakes in their contract? According to Michel Chossudovsky in Financial Bonanza behind the 9/11 Tragedy, “On October 17, 2000, eleven months before 9/11, Blackstone Real Estate Advisors, of The Blackstone Group, L.P, purchased, from Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association, the participating mortgage secured by World Trade Center, Building 7.1.” [Blackstone in 2000 also purchased a 50 percent stake in Universal Studios, producers of the myth-perpetuating Flight 93.]
“April 26, 2001 the Port Authority leased the WTC for 99 years to Silverstein Properties and Westfield America Inc. “The transaction was authorised by Port Authority Chairman Lewis M. Eisenberg. This transfer from the New York and New Jersey Port Authority was tantamount to the privatisation of the WTC Complex. The official press release described it as 'the richest real estate prize in New York City history'. The retail space underneath the complex was leased to Westfield America Inc. “On 24 July 2001, 6 weeks prior to 9/11 Silverstein took control of the lease of the WTC following the Port Authority decision on April 26. “Silverstein and Frank Lowy, CEO of Westefield Inc. took control of the 10.6 million-square-foot WTC complex. "Lowy leased the shopping concourse called the Mall at the WTC, which comprised about 427,000 square feet of retail space.”

“Explicitly included in the agreement was that Silverstein and Westfield ‘were given the right' to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed."

Solitamente quando un ente riconosce questo tipo di concessione è perchè in un futuro non troppo lontano intenderà alienare la proprietà definitivamente...

Silverstein - Blackstone, concessionario novantanovennale dei diritti di superficie del WTC
Lowy - Westfield aggiudicatario della gara di leasing per lo spazio commerciale al minuto all'interno del WTC
Greenberg - Greenberg Traurig, LLP, consulenza legale, legato alla famiglia Bush attraverso BBH (Brown Brothers Harriman bank), ricade tra gli amministratori dei fondi di compensazione per le vittime del 9/11 http://www.gtlaw.com/home.aspx
Eisenberg - Port Authority Chairman

Jewish National Fund e United Jewish Appeal

"War and Globalization go hand in hand. Militarization supports the conquest of new economic frontiers and the worldwide imposition of "free market" system."

"Israel is the fifth nuclear power in the World. Its nuclear arsenal is more advanced than that of Britain."

"The new nuclear policy explicitly involves the large defense contractors in decision-making. It is tantamount to the "privatization" of nuclear war. Corporations not only reap multibillion dollar profits from the production of nuclear bombs, they also have a direct voice in setting the agenda regarding the use and deployment of nuclear weapons."

"A 1995 National Security document of the Clinton administration stated quite clearly that the objective of the war is oil. "to protect the United States' uninterrupted, secure U.S. access to oil."

"Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was National Security Adviser to President Jimmy Carter was one of the key architects of the Al Qaeda network, created by the CIA at the onslaught of the Soviet Afghan war (1979-1989)."

"The "war on terrorism" is to provide a justification for repealing the Rule of Law, ultimately with a view to "preserving civil liberties."

"The Central Role of Al Qaeda in Bush's National Security Doctrine Spelled out in the National Security Strategy (NSS), the preemptive "defensive war" doctrine and the "war on terrorism" against Al Qaeda constitute the two essential building blocks of the Pentagon's propaganda campaign."

- Chossudovsky -

(http://www.countercurrents.org/us-chossudovsky291203.htm)

9/11: agenzie di sicurezza immuni. "Patriot act", un'offesa inaccettabile.

Nel "Patriot act", si riconosce l'immunità, alle agenzie incaricate della sicurezza negli aeroporti da cui sarebbero partiti i 19 terroristi.

L'agenzia di sicurezza degli aeroporti era: "International Consultants on Targeted Security".

...Israeliana, la lista di clienti è pressochè interminabile: http://www.ictseurope.com/.

"In the case of at least one of these security defendants, Huntleigh USA, there would seem to be a serious conflict of interest for the judge because the airline security company who is responsible for the shocking security lapses at both the Boston and Newark airports on 9-11 is a wholly-owned subsidiary of an Israeli company (ICTS) headed by Israelis with clear ties to Israel's military intelligence agency, the Mossad.

Huntleigh USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Israeli company called International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) International N.V., a Netherlands-based aviation and transportation security firm headed by "former [Israeli] military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies." (http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=87695).

Il link, sebbene in inglese, è chiaro per gli argomenti descritti.

Giudice sionista, agenzia di sicurezza controllata da israeliani e la sezione del "Patriot act", semplici coincidenze?

"The 9-11 wrongful death and personal injury cases against American Air Lines (AA) or UAL or any of the foreign security companies, namely Argenbright Security (British), Globe Aviation Services Corp. (Swedish) and Huntleigh USA Corp. (Israeli) are being handled by U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York."

"Hellerstein, 73, on the other hand, has deep and longstanding Zionist connections and close family ties to the state of Israel. A Zionist is a supporter of the state of Israel. Hellerstein’s wife is a former senior vice president and current treasurer of a New York-based Zionist organization called AMIT. AMIT promotes Jewish immigration to Israel and stands for Americans for Israel and Torah. AMIT’s motto is “Building Israel—One Child at a Time.”Hellerstein is a member of the Jewish Center of New York and a former president of the Board of Jewish Education of Greater New York."

"Kenneth R. Feinberg, for example, the special master of the federally funded Victims’ Compensation Fund, is also a dedicated Zionist. Feinberg single-handedly administered the $7 billion fund that paid out U.S. taxpayer money to some 97 percent of the families who could have sued to recover tort damages for monetary loss and pain and suffering. Those who accepted funds signed away their right to litigate against the government, the airlines or the security companies.The Kenneth Feinberg Group is listed as one of the top 10 supporters of the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies for 2004-2005. The Jerusalem Institute is an Israel-based Zionist organization that, among other things, supports the building of the illegal separation wall across Palestine." (http://www.feinberggroup.com/biosFeinberg.htm)

...merito di Attivissimo!

Postavo sul blog gestito da Attivissimo, con lui che asseriva di aver parlato con un pilota di KC135 "stratotanker", aerocisterna militare da rifornimento in volo, che gli raccontava delle manovre d'esercitazione simulanti un touch-and-go, sulla pista rasoterra senza toccarla.
Su youtube ho trovato subito il video qui sopra.
Il filmato lascia intendere la possibilità del volo a bassissima quota così come mostrato, eccetto per il fatto che al comando ci siano piloti con esperienza militare e non "novellini" appena usciti da simulatori da volo da 100.000 dollari...
Mi incuriosisce il fatto che la sagoma si vede distintamente molto bene sullo sfondo, a differenza delle uniche immagini rilasciate dalle due telecamere di sorveglianza al Pentagono.
Probabilmente l'aereo nel video non è in una leggera picchiata a 850 km/h, ma, comunque la velocità, permette di riscontrare il percorso effettuato e riprese senza "sbaffature"...
Lo studio di Henry62, può spiegare perchè le telecamere non abbiano catturato l'aereo, ma non può spiegare perchè su nessuno dei 5 fotogrammi rilasciati non si veda nulla...
Qualcuno ha fatto delle triangolazioni, studiando la prospettiva e le angolazione rispetto alla posizione dell'aereo che impattava la facciata...
Io non sono in grado di farlo, ma sarebbe interessante effettuare questa verifica per confrontarla con quella del Pentagono per comprendere se si fosse necessariamente potuto vedere, nell'esiguo arco di tempo in cui è avvenuto l'impatto, l'aereo dell'american oppure no.